Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. chil. fonoaudiol. (En línea) ; 18: 1-7, nov. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1095118

ABSTRACT

En el modelo de la Práctica Basada en la Evidencia el fonoaudiólogo debe conocer los criterios diagnósticos y el nivel de evidencia de los procedimientos de intervención para ofrecer un tratamiento adecuado. En la literatura se describe un bajo grado de formación académica y un escaso uso de la Práctica Basada en la Evidencia como fuente de acceso a diagnósticos y tratamientos. Este estudio investigó las dificultades de los fonoaudiólogos para acceder a los criterios para el diagnóstico fonoaudiológico. Se realizó una encuesta masiva online a 384 fonoaudiólogos, usando un método cuantitativo, descriptivo y transeccional. Los resultados indican que, independiente de los años de ejercicio laboral, un 79,7% de los encuestados utiliza fuentes secundarias para el acceso a criterios para el diagnóstico fonoaudiológico, un 46% no conoce fuentes de información fiables para acceder a diagnósticos y un 73,4% afirma haber tenido dificultades para acceder a criterios diagnósticos. Los sujetos encuestados no utilizan fuentes primarias que les permitan acceder a criterios que apoyen los diagnósticos fonoaudiológicos. Por lo anterior, se considera relevante educar sobre Práctica Basada en la Evidencia en el contexto universitario.


In the Evidence-Based Practice model, the speech and language therapist must know the diagnostic criteria and be aware of the evidence supporting the intervention procedures, to provide an effective treatment. However, the literature describes both low levels of academic training and scarce use of evidence-based practices as a base of speech and language diagnosis and treatments. This study probes into the difficulties speech and language therapists face to access the diagnostic criteria and their bibliographic references. A massive online survey was conducted with 384 speech therapists, using a quantitative, descriptive and transectional method. Results show that 79.7% of respondents use secondary sources to access criteria on which subsequently base their speech and language diagnoses, 46% do not know reliable sources of information to access criteria for diagnoses and 73.4% maintain that they had difficulties in accessing diagnostic criteria. These difficulties do not recede with years of practice. Based on these results it is possible to conclude that surveyed therapists presented difficulty to find information on which to establish their diagnostic criteria and they do not use primary sources for access information. All of this supports training students on Evidence Based Practice when in their University programs.


Subject(s)
Humans , Speech Therapy , Evidence-Based Practice , Language Disorders/diagnosis , Language Therapy , Chile , Surveys and Questionnaires , Access to Information
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL